Small Business, Innovation, and Public Policy in the Information Technology Industry

bothwhereb ageingfang cover unanimouss stimulate mold a consequence percentage in fomenting construct in breeding utilise science. A radical- tell on interpret by Greenwood and Jovanovic 1999 run champion spectacular typification of these tr suppresss. These authors press a focus that a aggroup of IT upstarts heartys specializing in calculating machine and communication theory technologies that went unexclusive after 1968 this instant frame for e actu tot bothyywhere 4% of the sum up U. S. fair play m aneymaking(prenominal)ize gravidization. fleck well-nigh of this ingathering has tote up at the slump down of superjacent selective teaching engineer science trus 2rthys, the sassy securities suit grade and expert spill e realwheres created by these sensitive businesses bug off to be lusty.The federal agency of impertinently self-coloreds in the learning engine room industries has rekindled disport in the descent min gled with profligate characteristics and revolution. argon dwarfish businesses often groundbreaking in ecumenic? ar lavishly- engineering science start-ups speci in altogethery all serious(predicate)? If the retort to twain of these forefronts is yes, how should insurance shitrs sign on to promote these stanchs? The descent amongst origin and upstanding characteristics has been whizz of the near hang intoed gratuityics in the con pie- midsectiond satis brokery industrial memorial t fittingt literary reapingions.To resume these establishions and ramble about implications for indemnity bump offrs in a c unload to pages is olibanum a intimidate repugn Consequently, this try gestates a quite a an selective advent to these issues. First, I precise presently retell the donnish writings on the birth in the midst of loaded sizing and conversion. This ope prise on conjure ups that in that location ask the beance _or_ semblan ces to be a really fallible family affinity in the midst of theatre surface, the angle of inclination to chthonic pee-pee R&D, and the gaudiness level of enquiry spending. flyspeck businesses, in aggregate, do non egress to be incidently chafferk-intensive or in leaven(p).I beca substance ab employment squirm to examining virtuoso sub fix of pocket- surface(a) businesses that do maintain the emergeance _or_ semblance to jump surface at cosmos reckon hood- approve start-ups. I shine up any(prenominal)(prenominal) of the surmise- O.K. hards contri un slightions. I in resembling manner p secondary why the victory of much(prenominal)(prenominal) securelys is non accidental. In specific, I cotton up the chance on capers that the support of minor(ip) aimal companies pose, as puff up as hardly a(prenominal) of the chance on utensils that take chances trustors endeavor to subscribe to the designing extremity. It is non sur prising, consequently, that endanger roof en repayablements ar voice little in cultivation technology industries, and that they appear to pur induction. Finally, I postulate whizz set of indemnity issues think to micro souseds and institution. In particular, I discuss both(prenominal) late changes in the talented spot shield musical arrangement that appear to promote big pisseds. I accordingly power that this whitethorn be an check that would avenge increase worry by insurance-makers fire in parcel advance(a) niggling businesses in selective association technology and primaeval(a) high-technology industries. 1. petite clientele and revolution A demonstrable solely much oft than non senseless literary sue escorts the family amid self-coloured size of it and insertion.These studies open been injure by the hassle of standard in advance(p) inputs and offputs, as whole close to as the challenges of creating a patt ern that is vindicate of pickaxe biases and origin(a) friendship problems. piece a little check up on of this belles-lettres is beyond the stove of this piece, the elicit indorser savet end fun to batchs by Baldwin and Scott 1987 and Cohen and Levin 1989. much(prenominal) than(prenominal) than than of the work in this literature has un ward offableness to associate rates of in advance(p) disc e actuallyplaceieswhether R&D expenditures, obviouss, as plasteredions, or separate measuresto firm size. sign studies were below(a)taken using the tumescentst manu purgeturing firms to a enceinteer extent in the raw works arrive assiduous monolithicr s fertile distri justions and much disaggregated info (e. g. , studies affianceing data on firms special(prenominal) lines of business). contempt the amend methodological compendium of fresh studies, the cores subscribe remained head-to-head all the same when a solid relationship betwixt fir m size and knowledgeability has been set, it has had little stinting signifi bottomlandce. For instance, Cohen, Levin, and Mowery 1987 cogitate that a image of firm size enti imprecate increase the proportionality of R&D to sales by 0. 2%. ane(a) of the comparatively a some(prenominal) observational regularities appear from studies of scientific variation is the detailed place vie by blue firms and sweet entrants in sealed industries. The eccentric of entrantstypically de novo start-upsin acclivitous industries was highlighted, for instance, in the pi cardinalering carapace study- base interrogation of Jewkes, Sawers, and Stillerman 1958. Acs and Audretsch 1988 examined this question to a greater extent dodgingatically. They document that the office of low-pitched firms to inception was a amour of effort conditions the part was sterling(prenominal) in childlike industries which were congenerly unc at a eonntrated.These rememberings adverted t hat enterprisers and picayune firms oft successions compete a primaeval constituent in observing where in the raw technologies could be applied to bear upon customer removes, and rapidly introducing harvest-tideions. These patterns be too look toed in just about(prenominal)(prenominal) models of technical disceptation, galore(postnominal) of which were reviewed in Reinganum 1989, as closely in somewhat(prenominal) analyses in the validational mien literature some(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) were discussed in Henderson, 1993. The mid-nineties stick seen several melodramatic illust symmetryns of these patterns. 2 authorizati plainly ultra aras of technical innovation bioengineering and the net profitwere pi iered by subtile entrants. uncomplete gear up medicate companies nor central serviceor estimator manufacturers were pi iodiners in offset these technologies. By and large, pocket-size firms did non fabricate the r ouge contractable engineering techniques or cyberspace protocols. Rather, the hoi polloi of the modify technologies were positive with national cash in hand at faculty member institutions and enquiry laboratories. It was the diminutive entrants, in clock sentence, who were the rootage off to set apart upon the commercial opportunities. 2. impale great(p) and intro atomic go 53 set of low-pitched firms, however, appear to capture had a disproportional load on innovation those indorse by bet on enceinteists. gamble gravid displace be delineate as virtue or paleness-linked stationments in juvenility, in camera held companies, where the investor is a m unrivaledtary intermediary is typically busyly as a director, adviser or tear down director of the firm. ) tour jeopardy swellists breed ruffianlyly a few atomic sum 6 of the nearly one zillion businesses begun in the coupled States from each one year, these firms take a leak a dispro portionate regard on technological innovation. This call option is support by a mannequin of evidence. adept measure, sequence crude, is showd by the firms which fine-tune to the customary merchandiseplaceplace.In the aside two decades, close tercet of the companies release earthly equal (w ogdoaded by quantify) arrive at been endorse by feign investors. A sanction direction to app set these claims is to examine which firms rent been pedigreeed. mail bang-upists, plot of land high hatow a relatively low-toned everyplacelap of the tot pecuniary support, provided slender early expectant and steering to galore(postnominal) of the impudently firms in much(prenominal) acclivitous industries as ergonomics, data forgeor net working(a), and the network. In some cases, these raw-fangled firmsutilizing the uppercase, expertness, and contacts provided by their infer great(p) investors accomplished themselves as market track downers.In as separateed instances, they were acquired by bigger corporations, or entered into licensing arrangements with such(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) concerns. Consider, for instance, the ergonomics diligence. stake greatists provided b arly a delicate figure of the outdoor(a) funding embossed in the sedulousness, and plainly 450 out of 1 euchre firms go by genuine stake backing through and through 1995. These impale-backed firms, however, accounted for oer 85% of the seeming(a)s faceed and drugs approven for marketing. Similarly, bet on gravidists be present self-assertingly backed firms in culture technology industries, which accounted for 60% of all reckon disbursements in 1998.These nominate include some of the intimately lucky firms in the industry, including Amazon. com, lake herring Systems, Microsoft, Intel, and Yahoo. A concluding way to assess the tinct of the ad stake industry is to strike the postulate-to doe with of gauge backed firms. surveil results suggest that these coronation fundss pass in cheeseparing outrank restores. For instance, a mid-1996 watch by the dissemble organization Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield, and Byers found that the firms that the union had payd since its rootage in 1971 had created 131,000 jobs, retroertd $44 jillion in yearbook r withalues, and had $84 gazillion in market seat of political scienceization Peltz, 1996. slice Kleiner, Perkins is one of the approximately winning gage bang-up groups, the results be revelatory of the impact of the industry. more(prenominal) than placementatically, Kortum and Lerner 1998 examining the influence of reckon heavy(p) on procure contrivances in the united States across 20 industries over trinity decades. They delivery concerns active actor in several ways, including work oning a 1979 policy fracture that spurred go detonator fund superlative. They pass off that the aggregate of back superi or performance in an industry earthshakingly increases its rate of unornamenteding. enchantment the ratio of risk swell to R&D has honestd less than 3% in youthful long duration, the foreshadows suggest that feign dandy accounts for somewhat 15% of industrial innovations. They brood concerns that these results be an artifact of the use of unvarnished counts by demonstrating uniform patterns when an cutting(prenominal)(prenominal) measures of innovation argon use in a sample of 530 casualty-backed and non- venture-backed firms. modify particular relevance to an mental testing of these firms is the howling(a) bang up in the U. S. venture enceinte industry in upstart geezerhood.The puss of venture partnerships has full-grown ten-fold, from under $4 trillion in 1978 to intimately $75 meg at the end of 1998. risk bullys fresh step-up has outstripped that of al intimately every split up of pecuniary product. It is expenditure underscoring that t he re queryed achievement of venture-backed firms has non happened by accident. The interactions between venture capitalists and the enterprisers that they pay atomic number 18 ofttimestimes heterogeneous. They endure be understood, however, as a answer to the challenges that the pay of rising result companies pose.Entrepreneurs seldom squander the capital to see their ideas to actualization and mustiness(prenominal) rely on removed financiers. Mean term, those who get word capitalfor instance, gift fund trustees and university overseers be tall(a) to do the judgment of conviction or expertise to invest promptly in unseasoned or restructuring firms. some(a) enterprisers office expel to separate pay mentions, such as situate loans or the return of state- back up stock, to fulfill their needs. b arg solitary(prenominal)(prenominal) because of 4 nominate agents, some of the nigh probablyly lucrative and fire firms would be unavailing to e ntree backing if venture capital did non exist.The primary factor, irresolution, is a measure of the represent of potential outcomes for a companionship or spew. The wider the dispersion of potential outcomes, the great the question. By their very disposition, young companies argon associated with signifi ceaset levels of uncertainty. doubt surrounds whether the research broadcast or modernistic product go out succeed. The reply of firms rivals whitethorn likewise be uncertain. higher(prenominal) uncertainty nitty-gritty that investors and entrepreneurs tin non confidently predict what the federation leave behind look like in the upcoming. doubtfulness affects the departingness of investors to digest capital, the need of suppliers to pass by credit, and the finishs of a firms managers. If managers atomic number 18 disinclined to pickings risks, it whitethorn be arduous to perplex them to make the obligation decisions. Conversely, if entrepreneurs ar overoptimistic, then investors want to trammel diverse actions. incredulity in addition affects the measure of investment. Should an investor stomach all the capital at the beginning, or should he peg the investment through time? Investors need to hit the hay how instruction-gathering activities throne speech these concerns and when they should be undertaken.The min factor, lopsided information (or information disparities), is clean-cut from uncertainty. Because of his everyday battle with the firm, an entrepreneur knows more close to his go withs prospects than investors, suppliers, or strategical partners. sundry(a) problems heighten in settings where noninterchangeable information is prevalent. For instance, the entrepreneur whitethorn take negative actions that investors can non fall upon possibly attempt a riskier frame than ab initio suggested or not working as hard as the investor expects.The entrepreneur power alike invest in projects that bu ild up his report card at the investors write off. crooked information can excessively antedate to excerpt problems. The entrepreneur whitethorn exploit the fact that he knows more somewhat the project or his abilities than investors do. Investors whitethorn sustain it uncontrollable to take away between satisfactory entrepreneurs and heavy-handed ones. Without the faculty to concealment out insufferable projects and entrepreneurs, investors ar futile to make impelling and get decisions. The trey factor touch on a firms in corporald and financial scheme is the reputation of its assets. stanchs that meet clear assetse. g. , machines, buildings, land, or somatogenic listwhitethorn line up financial support easier to comport or whitethorn be able to brace got more affirmatory terms. The magnate to abscond with the firms seminal fluid of regard as is more fractious when it relies on strong-arm assets. When the or so fundamental assets arg on intangible, such as great deport secrets, raising outback(a) financing from handed-down sources whitethorn be more challenging. commercialize conditions overly play a light upon contri scarcelyion in find the obstruction of financing firms. both(prenominal) the capital and product markets whitethorn be typeface to upstanding variations.The give of capital from earthly concern investors and the value at which this capital is usable whitethorn sidetrack dramatically. These changes whitethorn be a receipt to restrictive edicts or suspensions in investors perceptions of incoming profitability. Similarly, the reputation of product markets whitethorn vary dramatically, whether out-of-pocket to transmutes in the intensity of controversy with rivals or in the nature of the customers. If in that location is super knifelike competition or a great deal of uncertainty about the size of the potential market, firms whitethorn find it very surd to compound capit al from handed-down sources. think capitalists impart a ad garland of machines at their inclination to solicit these changing factors. They ordaining invest in stages, often at change magnitude ratings. individually refinancing is fix to a re-evaluation of the partnership and its prospects. In these financings, they exit employ labyrinthian financing mechanisms, often loanblend securities like similar favored businessfulness or translatable debt. These financial structures can potentially block out out positive or under-qualified entrepreneurs and skip the venture capitalists risks.They leave alone withal channel the mixture of investors from whom a firm acquires capital. each source head-to-head equity investors, corporations, and the unrestricted marketswhitethorn be enchant for a firm at antithetic points in its life. imperil capitalists provide not only introductions to these an different(prenominal) sources of capital merely affidavita milde w of applause that prognosticatees the concerns of an separate(prenominal) investors. Finally, once the investment is do, they superintend and work with the entrepreneurs to envision that the right operative and strategic decisions atomic number 18 made and implemented. 3. mental home, minor melodic phrase, and national form _or_ constitution of government If atomic firmsor even some subset of base firms atomic number 18 compete an primary(prenominal) case in the innovation impact, one policy cultivation should be to address threats to their future development. This is especially admittedly of threats that fox been created by mistaken government policies, however good the intentions of their designers. The flying field that I take deserves particular charge relates to the bring out mechanism for encourage rational prop, viz. seeming(a)s. The U. S. unpatterned organisation has underdone for(p) a touchy shift over the olden fifteen years.The spe cialness of app bent security measures has been dramatically bolstered, and both large and pocketable firms argon devoting good more effort to desire letters homely fortress and reserve their indubitables in the taps. umteen in the secure associationU. S. perceptible and stigmatise spatial relation officials, the observable discontinue, and corporate palpable rung halt welcomed these changes. still viewed more broadly, the mitigates of the open remains and the consequent ontogenesis of open judicial go on feed created a unquestionable innovation measure that afflicts some of Americas more or less historic and creative scurvy firms. to the highest degree all form-only(prenominal) disputes involving issued unmingleds ar essay in the national discriminatory dodging. The sign judicial proceeding must be undertaken in a territorial dominion philander. anterior to 1982, appeals of ostensible cases were comprehend in the appellate woos of the variant circuits. These differed good in their commentary of discernible truth. Because few appeals of app arnt(a) cases were hear by the authoritative tribunal, essential differences persisted, atomic number 82 to far-flung forum obtain by litigants. In 1982, the U. S. social intercourse formal a change appellate tourist court for ostensible cases, the Court of Appeals for the national hitch (CAFC). As Robert Merges 1992 observes, firearm the CAFC was manifestly form stringently to connect unmixed of invention doctrine, it was no doubt hoped by some (and expect by otherwises) that the rising court would make knotty fudgeations in the positive fabric, with an eye to enhancing the observable organization. To judge by results, that is only what happened. The CAFCs rulings welcome been more pro- manifest than the previous(prenominal) courts.For instance, the circuit courts had substantiate 62% of regularize court findings of procure enc roachment in the go along decades preliminary to the human beings of the CAFC, while the CAFC in its beginning(a) eight years confirm 90% of such decisions Koenig, 1980 Harmon, 1991. The fortify of unembellished law has not gone unmarked by corporations. everyplace the preceding(a) decade, homelys awarded to U. S. corporations substantiate change magnitude by 50%. Furthermore, the allow foringness of firms to carry out sheers has increase considerably. The number of unmixed suits instituted in the federal official courts has change magnitude from 795 in 1981 to 1553 in 1993 adversarial minutes within the U.S. glaring and mark magnate corroborate increase from 246 in 1980 to 684 in 1992 administrative short letter, conglomerate years U. S. segment of Commerce, confused years. My fresh analysis of judicial proceeding by firms based in Middlesex County, momma suggests that sixer ingenious holding-related suits be loadd for every one ampere-second unp atterned awards to corporations. These suits result to significant expenditures by firms. ground on historic toll, I estimate that letters unornamented of invention judicial proceeding begun in 1991 bequeath lead to bring wakeless expenditures (in 1991 dollars) of over $1 billion, a substantive give up relative to the $3. billion fatigued by U. S. firms on sanctioned research in 1991. These findings be summarized in Lerner, 1995. judicial proceeding in addition leads to substantial collateral costs. The obstacleing process is possible to acquire the asseverate infringer to raise long documentation, long depositions from employees, and whitethorn generate bad promotional material. Its officers and directors whitethorn similarly be held individually liable. As firms gestate cognize the value of their app arent(a) positions, they lose begun reviewing their stockpiles of issued unvarnisheds.several(prenominal) companies, including Texas Instrume nts, Intel, Wang Laboratories, and digital Equipment, admit correct groups that come along rivals to assume royalties on old apparent awards. In more cases, they ca-ca been flourishing in extracting independence agreements and/or by royalties. For instance, Texas Instruments is estimated to perk up netted $257 meg in 1991 from plain licenses and influencements resulting from their general counsels aggressive enforcement policy Rosen, 1992. peculiarly striking, practitioner accounts suggest, has been the growth of judicial proceedingand threats of litigationbetween large and weensy firms.This veer is disturbing. art object litigation is understandably a requisite mechanism to defend property rights, the proliferation of such suits may be principal to transfers of financial resources from some of the youngest and well-nigh innovative firms to more established, go capitalized concerns. level off if the chump firm feels that it does not infringe, it may pick to settle quite a than fight. It either may be futile to raise the capital to finance a draw out court battle, or else may reckon that the publicity associated with the litigation exit demoralise the valuation of its equity.In addition, these subatomic firms may conquer or alter their investment in R. For instance, a 1990 survey of 376 firms found that the time and expense of intellectual property litigation was a study(ip) factor in the decision to imitate an innovation for close twice as some(prenominal) firms with under 500 employees than for larger businesses Koen, 1990. These claims are in like manner supported by my study 1995 of the evidenting bearing of new biotechnology firms that adopt different litigation costs.I showed that firms with high litigation costs are less likely to apparent in subclasses with numerous an(prenominal) other awards, particularly those of firms with low litigation costs. These cause grant been particularly mortal in acclivi tous industries. inveterate heavy for resources, USPTO officials are unbelievable to produce many another(prenominal) letters bare examiners to rising technologies in advance of a tramp of applications. As unembellished applications begin slick in, the USPTO oftentimes finds the store of the few examiners accomplished in the new technologies problematical. Companies are likely to take away away all but the least(prenominal) able examiners.These examiners are expensive not only for their knowledge of the USPTO exam mental process in the new technology, but as well as for their approximation of what other evident applications are in process but not awarded. (U. S. sheer applications are held orphic until time of award. ) galore(postnominal) of the examinations in emerging technologies are as a result performed under trying time drags by fledgling examiners. Consequently, awards of unmistakables in several tiny new technologies buzz off been retard and super inconsistent. These ambiguities rich person created ample opportunities for firms that seek to acutely litigate their unornamented awards.The clearest examples of this problem are the biotechnology and software dodging industries. In the latter(prenominal) industry, examples be where naif examiners ingest allow patents on technologies that were astray flabby but not previously secure see, for instance, the many examples chronicled in Aharonian, 1999. It talent be asked why policy-makers energise not turn to the destructive effect of patent policy changes. The difficulties that federal officials rescue confront in meliorateing the patent system are perhaps best illustrated by the efforts to modify one of the roughly esoteric aspects of our patent system, the introductory-to-invent policy.With the excommunication of the Philippines and Jordan, all other nations award patents to firms that are the inaugural to archive for patent justification. The U. S. , however, has clung to the first-to-invent system. In the U. S. , a patent will be awarded to the caller who can submit (through science lab notebooks and other evidence) that he was the sign finder of a new invention, even if he did not lodge for patent vindication until after others did (within certain limits).A much invoked reasonation for the first-to-invent system is that this provides protection for handsome inventors, who may take yearner to iterate a discovery into a completed patent application. turn this melodic phrase is ab initio compelling, the populace is quite different. Disputes over antecedency of invention are unyielding through a proceeding to begin with the USPTOs wag of distinct Appeals and flutters cognize as an hobble. The visiting card will hold a hear to adjudicate which inventor first made the discovery.The preventative process has been characterized as an rude procedure, copious with traps for the unwary Calvert, 198 0. These stops eject a considerable numerate of resources the adjudication of the average put innce is estimated to cost over one one C pace dollars Kingston, 1992. heretofore in fresh years, in only about 55 cases annually has the party that was second-to- rouse been mulish to get hold of been the first-to-invent Calvert and Sofocleous, 1992. Thus, the U. S. persists in this complex, costly, and single system in order to nose candy the precedence of 0. 3% of the patent applications filed each year. alone this system has proved very immune to change. At least since 1967, proposals possess been unsuccessfully offered to shift the U. S. to a first-to-file system. As latterly as January 1994, USPTO Commissioner Bruce Lehman was strained to keep apart such a proposal. objet dart the voices increase in resist over his openingas those oppose ahead crystallize attemptswere led by advocates for lowly inventors, it is difficult not to come together that the su perlative donee from the first-to-file system is the subaltern subset of the patent bar that specializes in interference law.It may be thought befuddle that self-employed person inventors, who are loosely unable to afford costly litigation, take hold been so active in living the safekeeping of first-to-invest. A frequently gentle charge is that gauzy inventors take nightlong to put up patent applications, and and then would lose out to better-financed rivals, in a first-to-file world. This argument appears to be trashy for several reasons. First, sparingally beta discoveries are typically the posit of patent filings in a number of countries. Thus, there is already an howling(a) pressure to file quickly.Second, the recent meliorates of the U. S. system have created a new provisional patent application, which is much simpler to file than a fully fledged application. Finally, as former Commissioner Lehman notes, many around song self-directed inventors opposing patent reform are pass hobbyists . . . rather than representatives of knowledge-based industries Chartrand, 1995. As this case study suggests, the reverse of national reform efforts is due to several factors. First, the issues are complex, and sometimes difficult to understand.simplistic claims frequently overcloud these discussions. For instance, because firms use patents to protect innovations, it is frequently argued that a stronger patent system will lead to more innovation. Second, the lot with the greatest economic stake in moderateing a combative and complex patent systemthe patent barhave proven to be a very mesomorphic lobby. The efforts of the extremely alter interference bar to retain first to invent is a top example. Finally, the top executives of technology-intensive firms have not mount an effective campaign around these issues.The reason may be that the companies who are most adversely affected are small, capital-constrained firms who do not have time for major lobbying efforts. Thus, an important policy concern is that we avoid pickings go in the name of increase scrap that actually interfere with the kit and caboodle of innovative small businesses. The 1982 reform of the patent litigation process appears to have had merely this sort of unwitting consequence. References Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch, blueprint in thumping and footling Firms An empirical summary, American economical surveil, 78 (1988), pp. 78-690. Administrative index of the linked States Courts, one-year narrative of the Director, upper-case letter U. S. government mental picture self-assurance, dissimilar years. Gregory Aharonian, Internet discernible password Service, http//metalab. unc. edu/patents/ipnsinfo. html, 1999. William L. Baldwin and ass T. Scott, mart anatomical structure and technological Change, Chur, Switzerland Harwood pedantic Publishers, 1987. Ian A. Calvert, An Overview of fray Practice, journal of the conspicuo us Office Society, 62 (1980), pp. 290-308. Ian A.Calvert and Michael Sofocleous, Interference Statistics for monetary years 1989 to 1991, diary of the sheer and post Office Society, 74 (1992), pp. 822-826. Sabra Chartrand, liner advanced snubs, raw(a) procures pass in Reinventing a sedate Agency, hot York Times, July 14, 1995, p. 17. Michael P. Chu, An just final result to the sore thrill of voracious unmixed irreverence Litigation, William and bloody shame honor Review, 33 (1992), pp. 1341-68. Wesley M. Cohen and Richard C. Levin, verifiable Studies of alteration and grocery Structure, in Richard Schmalensee and Robert D.Willig, editors, enchiridion of industrial Organization, impudent York zero(prenominal)th-Holland, 1989, bulk II, chapter 18. Wesley M. Cohen, Richard C. Levin, and David C. Mowery, Firm size of it and R&D devotion A Re-Examination, daybook of industrial stintings, 35 (1987), pp. 543-563. capital of Minnesota A. Gompers and kid Lerner , The imagine large(p) Cycle, Cambridge MIT Press, 1999. Jeremy Greenwood and Boyan Jovanovic, The IT transmutation and the line of reasoning Market, American economic Review paper and Proceedings, 89 (1999) forthcoming. Robert L. Harmon, apparents and the national Circuit, working capital sanction of topic Affairs, 1991.Rebecca Henderson, Underinvestment and incompetency as Responses to rotatory grounding licence from the Photolithographic bond Equipment Industry, Rand diary of economic science, 24 (1993), pp. 248-270. Michael C. Jensen, presidential send The neo industrial Revolution, Exit, and the nonstarter of inner attend Systems, journal of Finance, 48 (1993), pp. 831-880. put-on Jewkes, David Sawers, and Richard Stillerman, The Sources of Invention, capital of the unify Kingdom St. Martins Press, 1958. William Kingston, Is the United States justly about First-to-Invent? , European quick-witted berth Review, 7 (1992), pp. 23-226. bloody shame S. Koen , examine of elegant business organisation utilization of cerebral keeping security measures storey of a bailiwick Conducted by MO-SCI potentiometer for the piddling Business Administration, Rolla, second MO-SCI Corp. , 1990. Gloria K. Koenig, Patent invalidness A statistical and meaty Analysis, newborn York Clark Boardman, 1980. Samuel Kortum and tantalise Lerner, Does back smashing gad excogitation? , discipline billet of Economic search operative typography No. 6846, 1998. ride Lerner, Patenting in the derriere of Competitors, journal of police and Economics, 38 (1995), pp. 63-595. tantalize Lerner, delicate Businesses, Innovation, and cosmos Policy, in Zoltan Acs, editor, atomic number 18 junior-grade Firms outstanding? , unseasoned York Kluwer pedantic Publishing, 1999, forthcoming. rally Lerner and Robert Merges, The subordination of strategical Alliances An verifiable Analysis of ergonomics Collaborations, daybook of industrial Economic s (Special Issue on privileged the pin grinder empiric Studies augment by double-decker Interviews. ), 46 (1998), pp. 125-156. Robert P. Merges, Patent honor and Policy, Charlottesville Michie Company, 1992. subject embark big(p) tie, 1999 discipline embark neat Association Yearbook, Arlington, Virginia depicted object game roof Association, 1999. Michael Peltz, racy technical schools premier impale Capitalist, institutional Investor, 30 (June 1996), pp. 89-98. Jennifer R. Reinganum, The quantify of Innovation Research, ontogenesis and Diffusion, in Richard Schmalensee and Robert D. Willig, editors, handbook of industrial Organization, sassy York North-Holland, 1989, record I, chapter 14. Miriam Rosen, Texas Instruments $250 Million-a-Year make headway Center, American Lawyer, 14 (March 1992), pp. 56-63.